Sunday, January 27, 2008

21st Century JUICE!

The New York Times


January 27, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist

The Age of Ambition

DAVOS, Switzerland

With the American presidential campaign in full swing, the obvious way to change the world might seem to be through politics.

But growing numbers of young people are leaping into the fray and doing the job themselves. These are the social entrepreneurs, the 21st-century answer to the student protesters of the 1960s, and they are some of the most interesting people here at the World Economic Forum (not only because they’re half the age of everyone else).

Andrew Klaber, a 26-year-old playing hooky from Harvard Business School to come here (don’t tell his professors!), is an example of the social entrepreneur. He spent the summer after his sophomore year in college in Thailand and was aghast to see teenage girls being forced into prostitution after their parents had died of AIDS.

So he started Orphans Against AIDS (www.orphansagainstaids.org), which pays school-related expenses for hundreds of children who have been orphaned or otherwise affected by AIDS in poor countries. He and his friends volunteer their time and pay administrative costs out of their own pockets so that every penny goes to the children.

Mr. Klaber was able to expand the nonprofit organization in Africa through introductions made by Jennifer Staple, who was a year ahead of him when they were in college. When she was a sophomore, Ms. Staple founded an organization in her dorm room to collect old reading glasses in the United States and ship them to poor countries. That group, Unite for Sight, has ballooned, and last year it provided eye care to 200,000 people (www.uniteforsight.org).

In the ’60s, perhaps the most remarkable Americans were the civil rights workers and antiwar protesters who started movements that transformed the country. In the 1980s, the most fascinating people were entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who started companies and ended up revolutionizing the way we use technology.

Today the most remarkable young people are the social entrepreneurs, those who see a problem in society and roll up their sleeves to address it in new ways. Bill Drayton, the chief executive of an organization called Ashoka that supports social entrepreneurs, likes to say that such people neither hand out fish nor teach people to fish; their aim is to revolutionize the fishing industry. If that sounds insanely ambitious, it is. John Elkington and Pamela Hartigan title their new book on social entrepreneurs “The Power of Unreasonable People.”

Universities are now offering classes in social entrepreneurship, and there are a growing number of role models. Wendy Kopp turned her thesis at Princeton into Teach for America and has had far more impact on schools than the average secretary of education.

One of the social entrepreneurs here is Soraya Salti, a 37-year-old Jordanian woman who is trying to transform the Arab world by teaching entrepreneurship in schools. Her organization, Injaz, is now training 100,000 Arab students each year to find a market niche, construct a business plan and then launch and nurture a business.

The program (www.injaz.org.jo) has spread to 12 Arab countries and is aiming to teach one million students a year. Ms. Salti argues that entrepreneurs can stimulate the economy, give young people a purpose and revitalize the Arab world. Girls in particular have flourished in the program, which has had excellent reviews and is getting support from the U.S. Agency for International Development. My hunch is that Ms. Salti will contribute more to stability and peace in the Middle East than any number of tanks in Iraq, U.N. resolutions or summit meetings.

“If you can capture the youth and change the way they think, then you can change the future,” she said.

Another young person on a mission is Ariel Zylbersztejn, a 27-year-old Mexican who founded and runs a company called Cinepop, which projects movies onto inflatable screens and shows them free in public parks. Mr. Zylbersztejn realized that 90 percent of Mexicans can’t afford to go to movies, so he started his own business model: He sells sponsorships to companies to advertise to the thousands of viewers who come to watch the free entertainment.

Mr. Zylbersztejn works with microcredit agencies and social welfare groups to engage the families that come to his movies and help them start businesses or try other strategies to overcome poverty. Cinepop is only three years old, but already 250,000 people a year watch movies on his screens — and his goal is to take the model to Brazil, India, China and other countries.

So as we follow the presidential campaign, let’s not forget that the winner isn’t the only one who will shape the world. Only one person can become president of the United States, but there’s no limit to the number of social entrepreneurs who can make this planet a better place.

You are invited to comment on this column at Mr. Kristof’s blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Movie Industry & The Creative Class!

Albom, Binder say incentives can make state site for films

January 23, 2008

BY DAWSON BELL

FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Michigan would become a preferred site for the film industry almost overnight if state government provided bigger financial incentives and other help to the people who make movies, according to testimony Tuesday from Free Press columnist and author Mitch Albom and Michigan native and filmmaker Mike Binder.

"This is a booming, growing business," Albom said, and "there is a simple way for us to get into it. Incentives will do it."

Albom, whose work has been adapted into several made-for-TV movies, and Binder, whose credits include "The Upside of Anger," urged the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee to act quickly on legislation to increase the tax breaks for movie and TV production from 20% to 40%.

They also urged the committee to create tax incentives for people who return to Michigan to work in the industry and beef up the state's Film Commission. Doing those things could spur a major industry and job creator within just a few years, Albom said.

Binder said the state needs to send a signal that its labor unions would welcome filmmakers.

Both said productions they are working on could be shot in Michigan as soon as this year if the incentives were put in place quickly.

Lawmakers attending the hearing signaled they were willing to move quickly.

State Sen. Hansen Clarke, D-Detroit, said his city was a perfect location for producers interested in "gritty urban reality." He also expressed hope that its appearance in film would make the city a more attractive place to live and work for young people.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm also supports increased incentives for TV and movie production, spokeswoman Liz Boyd said.

But details remain sketchy, and the actual legislation to enact the changes still is being drafted.

Contact DAWSON BELL at 313-222-6604 or dbell@freepress.com.



PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: Movie Industry and the Creative Class
_____

Politcally correct while generating CREATIVE vehicles for "capital formation" and addtitional revenue-generating activities.

These are also the kind of Creative Class assets that KEEP and ATTRACT 21st Century talent in and to our state.

Bring it On!

See more: http://www.dwiff.blogspot.com
_________________
Jim Ross
21st Century Digital Learning Environments
41810 Huntington Ct.
Clinton Township, MI 48038
586-228-0608

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

An "Ode" to an earlier endeavor.......Gone but not forgotten

Lights, camera, action ... Michigan

In our Opinion / Editorial

Detroit Free Press

January 22, 2008

Having recently enjoyed dinner together, perhaps Gov. Jennifer Granholm, state House Speaker Andy Dillon and Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop could next take in a movie.

And take in the possibility, too, of rolling out a deep red carpet to bring more of the movie industry to Michigan. If Lansing's leadership is looking for an issue to wrap themselves bipartisanly around in the early going of this year, a hefty tax break to lure filmmakers could be it.

While it's not the kind of heavy industry that made Michigan so prosperous and proud in the past, the film/video business is a growing field that uses cutting-edge technology and appeals to the bright, young "creative class" folks who are leaving Michigan for lack of opportunities. Beyond writers, performers and directors, moviemaking also employs technicians, builders, logistics and numbers people, and food service and hospitality providers.

It's a $60-billion-a-year business in the United States that is expanding with the number of outlets to show movies -- cable stations are hungry for original programming -- and the new means of delivering video information. It's not just about commercial feature films anymore, either, but also advertising, music videos, games, instructional DVDs and television shows. That DVD that came with the elliptical trainer you got for Christmas had to be made somewhere.

Michigan will never displace sunny southern California as the heart of the movie industry, but recent trends show that moviemakers will work anywhere if there's a tax payoff. That's why a number of recent movies set in Detroit ("Four Brothers," "Assault on Precinct 13," for example) were largely shot in Ontario.

Canada has enjoyed great success with a tax-break strategy; provinces are now competing with each other to offer the best deals. States have begun queuing up with tax plans and proposals, too. Put another way, Michigan is already late to this game.

However, language is being drafted for legislation that could set the tax rebate for filmmakers as high as 35%-40%, the best deal in the country. A state Senate committee is scheduled to consider the possibilities at a hearing this afternoon in Lansing, although a bill is not yet ready.

This seems like the proverbial no-brainer.

It brings new business and jobs into Michigan, even if only for as long as the filmmaking lasts, so whatever revenue the state gets is new money; 60% of something is better than 100% of nothing. There's no double-standard against other employers, since Michigan has a long history of offering tax breaks to coveted businesses or using tax incentives for the expansion of existing companies.

Successful commercial movies put a place on the map. Couples who see "Somewhere in Time" are still drawn to romantic weekends on Mackinac Island, where the movie was made in 1979. Michigan offers just about every kind of location, four seasons and, unfortunately, has a huge inventory of big, empty buildings that could be converted to sound stages. Not much happening inside the Wixom plant these days.

Movie companies can now get a 12%-20% state tax write-off on their costs in Michigan. Janet Lockwood, director of the Michigan Film Office, said "Michigan has to go big" in whatever tax plan is offered to compete with other states, such as New Mexico and Connecticut, which are aggressively grabbing larger shares of the movie business.

With bipartisan interest, the state House had a hearing on the tax-break idea last fall. and Lansing's Gongwer News Service reported Monday that Gov. Jennifer Granholm might have something to say about it in her State of the State speech next week.

Seems like the stage is set. Action!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: Lights Camera, Action!
_____

Could be a "Detroit Ticket" to ride. Creative Class and Content "Catalyst!" Sign-on for more at http://www.dwiff.blogspot.com

Best,

Jim Ross
_________________
Jim Ross
21st Century Digital Learning Environments
41810 Huntington Ct.
Clinton Township, MI 48038
586-228-0608

THINK STEM CENTER / MICHIGAN

Pfizer to announce contribution today

Pfizer Inc. will announce major donations to benefit science education and the life sciences in Michigan Tuesday.


That happens to be the one-year anniversary of the date the company announced it would shut down its Ann Arbor pharmaceutical research center, eliminating 2,100 jobs and 2.1 million square feet of real estate.

Gathering at a warehouse in Ypsilanti to make the 11 a.m. announcement will be Michael A. Finney, president and CEO of Ann Arbor Spark; Stephen T. Rapundalo, executive director of MichBio; Ronald R. Kitchens, CEO of Southwest Michigan First; Debra Gmerek, vice president of Pfizer Global Research and Development, and representatives of the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, Wayne State University and Eastern Michigan University.

UPDATE

Pfizer's giveaway aids labs, schools


January 23, 2008

BY ROBIN ERB

FREE PRESS EDUCATION WRITER

It's a going-out-of-business giveaway -- just in time to replace your outdated mini vortexer or microtome cryostat.

For those breaking into the world of research and development in life sciences, there is at least $5.5 million worth of state-of-the-art valuables taken from Pfizer's soon-to-close Ann Arbor research facility that will be available to use on the cheap.

Last week, another load of Pfizer equipment was delivered to a warehouse in Ypsilanti managed in part by Ann Arbor SPARK, the area's economic development group.

Through an agreement with the group, the surplus equipment and supplies may be licensed for 1% of their market value for 3 years, said Joseph (Skip) Simms, the group's executive director.

Called the Michigan Innovation Equipment Depot, the project began more than a year ago when Pfizer donated $1 million in equipment to SPARK for Michigan's businesses. Friday's delivery was part of $4.5 million worth of equipment headed for start-up businesses. A list can be found at www.AnnArborUSA.org/MIED.

In the year since Pfizer announced it would close the Ann Arbor facility and shave jobs in other locations in Michigan, it has also shared the wealth with schools.

Pfizer turned over a 46-acre research campus in Holland to Michigan State University. And $1.25 million worth of goods is heading to MSU, the University of Michigan, Wayne State University and Eastern Michigan University.

About $250,000 in lab supplies will go to other schools.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

VizTHINK & XPLANE

Creativity & Innovation

Another Year ANOTHER Global Trade Mission PROJECT!

Automation Alley seeks sponsors for virtual global trade mission for students

Posted on 1/3/2008 8:08:57 PM

Automation Alley, the Troy-based technology business promotion group for Southeast Michigan, said this week it has partnered with the Macomb Intermediate School District, Oakland Community College and Oakland Schools to host its upcoming virtual, student-based Global Trade Mission and is currently seeking sponsors and volunteers.

Automation Alley’s GTM is a business simulation that prepares Southeast Michigan high school students for work in the global economy. With collaboration from business, education, and government, the GTM stands as a regional response to the challenges of the new global economy.

More than 200 students from Genesee, Macomb, and Oakland counties will learn skills for global citizenship; develop business solutions to trade challenges using the tools and information of the global marketplace; work hand-in-hand with business and trade experts; explore emerging careers in the region; and develop team skills to work effectively across diverse backgrounds.

“Offering high school students the opportunity to learn about international business at an early age is key to building our future knowledge-based economy,” said Ken Rogers, Automation Alley executive director. “As the world becomes increasingly flat and our economy diversifies, it is our hope that students explore new career opportunities.”

The GTM this year will be held at the Macomb Educational Service Center in Clinton Township from April 3-5 and Oakland Community College on Feb. 28, 29 and March 1.

Volunteer opportunities include being a cultural ambassador and educating the students on your home country; a cultural or business coach; helping students with their business plans; or a presentation evaluator. Available sponsorships include a Career and College Fair Sponsor at $5,000; a Global Trade Sponsor at $3,500; an Internship Sponsor at $2,500 and a Challenge Sponsor at $1,500. Other sponsorships are welcome.

If you are interested in participating or would like additional information, visit www.automationalley.com or call (800) 427-5100.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

WHAT!

photo

Empower teachers, principals

A smarter idea gets left behind in NCLB act

January 3, 2008

BY BARRY McGHAN

A recent state report, that nearly 50% of Michigan high schools failed to meet important goals of the federal No Child Left Behind law, is nothing new. It's the message we've heard for 40 years: Schools are bad and getting worse.

Not surprisingly, the peons of the system -- school principals and teachers -- are offered up as sacrifices by NCLB, in collusion with powerful special interests who control the purse strings and rules of this 19th Century education system we keep trying to whip into shape for a 21st Century world.

Crack! "Teach those kids!"

"If you don't, we'll give them to other schools, leaving you fewer resources to do your job. We expect things to become so hopeless you'll need to have your school reorganized. You'll be out of work!"

Crack! "Have we got your attention, yet?"

This all-stick-no-carrot approach perpetuates a top-down system where power is held by people who have no accountability for the work to be done. The accountability rests on people who have the least control over the situation.

This is crazy.

So, is NCLB a bad law? Yes and no.

The law has a good heart. But that's about all.

At its heart is the idea that all children can succeed in school, no matter their sex, color, family finances, parents' education, home language or any other factor. Beyond that, the law has problems.

For example, it lets states set their own goals for achievement. They understandably set them as low as feasible. Coincidentally, Michigan, desperately deep in recession, decided it could teach its way back to financial health by raising high school standards to unrealistic college entrance levels -- "all students can learn" on steroids.

Producing college-ready students starts in the home for most, and progresses step-by-step through the grades. It takes time. Kids from families unlucky enough to fall below the middle class require special efforts -- preschool, early intervention, and so on. If they missed those benefits, more is needed: special alternative schools and programs. That's a tall order for a state that can barely put a budget together.

The education power brokers -- politicians, state and district bureaucrats, experts in universities and think tanks, teachers unions -- impoverished of ideas, are little help to impoverished students. Commands from on high have not worked. They will not work.

The best the powers-that-be can do is empower the peons to do the job, and get out of the way. Give individual schools the autonomy they need to accomplish their mission as they see fit.

The bureaucracy should give schools decision-making authority, as well as control over most of the resources to implement those decisions. Individual schools need to control at least 95% of the money their students bring into a district.

This idea is hugely threatening to current power brokers. Further, making this transition to a leaner, meaner, more agile system will be very disruptive. At first, schools will flounder, some more than others. It's a price that has to be paid.

Take heart. There are reasons to believe the transition can succeed.

Let me tell you about Lula and Lois.

Grandma Lula taught more than 40 years in country schools in west Michigan. She loved her students, respected their parents, kept a laser-like focus on student achievement. She was a force to be reckoned with, known and loved (or at least respected) throughout the county.

A generation later, Lois, my late mother-in-law, another no-nonsense teacher, had a similar approach to her work with second graders in city schools. Other teachers loved to receive students from her classroom -- they could all read! Students, long gone from her class, kept in touch, as did their parents.

Most of the teachers I've known over 40 years of working in schools are good, honest, responsible people like Lula and Lois, doing their very best to help students. They are beaten down by the bureaucracy, disrespected by the press and much of the public, captives to a system that offers little more than a paycheck as a reason to keep up the good fight.

Many Michigan teachers are ready to take on managing their own schools for the benefit of their students. They need the "daddy-may-I" power brokers to become "sister-can-I-help" coprofessionals. They need a system in which parents have more choices for schooling their children, so that a better match can be found between a school's mission and a family's needs. They need an assessment system that enlightens the task ahead. Something more than ...

Crack! "Do better, or else!"

BARRY McGHAN, 68, of Fenton worked for the Flint Schools for 33 years, 20 as a teacher and 13 in a variety of nonteaching curriculum specialist positions. He retired in 1995 and founded the Center for Public School Renewal (www.publicschoolrenewal.org ). Write to him in care of the Free Press Editorial Page, 615 W. Lafayette, Detroit, MI 48226 or at oped@freepress.com.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

When the Thinking is Stinking! VIOLA!

The New York Times

December 30, 2007
Bright Ideas

Innovative Minds Don’t Think Alike

IT’S a pickle of a paradox: As our knowledge and expertise increase, our creativity and ability to innovate tend to taper off. Why? Because the walls of the proverbial box in which we think are thickening along with our experience.

Andrew S. Grove, the co-founder of Intel, put it well in 2005 when he told an interviewer from Fortune, “When everybody knows that something is so, it means that nobody knows nothin’.” In other words, it becomes nearly impossible to look beyond what you know and think outside the box you’ve built around yourself.

This so-called curse of knowledge, a phrase used in a 1989 paper in The Journal of Political Economy, means that once you’ve become an expert in a particular subject, it’s hard to imagine not knowing what you do. Your conversations with others in the field are peppered with catch phrases and jargon that are foreign to the uninitiated. When it’s time to accomplish a task — open a store, build a house, buy new cash registers, sell insurance — those in the know get it done the way it has always been done, stifling innovation as they barrel along the well-worn path.

Elizabeth Newton, a psychologist, conducted an experiment on the curse of knowledge while working on her doctorate at Stanford in 1990. She gave one set of people, called “tappers,” a list of commonly known songs from which to choose. Their task was to rap their knuckles on a tabletop to the rhythm of the chosen tune as they thought about it in their heads. A second set of people, called “listeners,” were asked to name the songs.

Before the experiment began, the tappers were asked how often they believed that the listeners would name the songs correctly. On average, tappers expected listeners to get it right about half the time. In the end, however, listeners guessed only 3 of 120 songs tapped out, or 2.5 percent.

The tappers were astounded. The song was so clear in their minds; how could the listeners not “hear” it in their taps?

That’s a common reaction when experts set out to share their ideas in the business world, too, says Chip Heath, who with his brother, Dan, was a co-author of the 2007 book “Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die.” It’s why engineers design products ultimately useful only to other engineers. It’s why managers have trouble convincing the rank and file to adopt new processes. And it’s why the advertising world struggles to convey commercial messages to consumers.

“I HAVE a DVD remote control with 52 buttons on it, and every one of them is there because some engineer along the line knew how to use that button and believed I would want to use it, too,” Mr. Heath says. “People who design products are experts cursed by their knowledge, and they can’t imagine what it’s like to be as ignorant as the rest of us.”

But there are proven ways to exorcise the curse.

In their book, the Heath brothers outline six “hooks” that they say are guaranteed to communicate a new idea clearly by transforming it into what they call a Simple Unexpected Concrete Credentialed Emotional Story. Each of the letters in the resulting acronym, Succes, refers to a different hook. (“S,” for example, suggests simplifying the message.) Although the hooks of “Made to Stick” focus on the art of communication, there are ways to fashion them around fostering innovation.

To innovate, Mr. Heath says, you have to bring together people with a variety of skills. If those people can’t communicate clearly with one another, innovation gets bogged down in the abstract language of specialization and expertise. “It’s kind of like the ugly American tourist trying to get across an idea in another country by speaking English slowly and more loudly,” he says. “You’ve got to find the common connections.”

In her 2006 book, “Innovation Killer: How What We Know Limits What We Can Imagine — and What Smart Companies Are Doing About It,” Cynthia Barton Rabe proposes bringing in outsiders whom she calls zero-gravity thinkers to keep creativity and innovation on track.

When experts have to slow down and go back to basics to bring an outsider up to speed, she says, “it forces them to look at their world differently and, as a result, they come up with new solutions to old problems.”

She cites as an example the work of a colleague at Ralston Purina who moved to Eveready in the mid-1980s when Ralston bought that company. At the time, Eveready had become a household name because of its sales since the 1950s of inexpensive red plastic and metal flashlights. But by the mid-1980s, the flashlight business, which had been aimed solely at men shopping at hardware stores, was foundering.

While Ms. Rabe’s colleague had no experience with flashlights, she did have plenty of experience in consumer packaging and marketing from her years at Ralston Purina. She proceeded to revamp the flashlight product line to include colors like pink, baby blue and light green — colors that would appeal to women — and began distributing them through grocery store chains.

“It was not incredibly popular as a decision amongst the old guard at Eveready,” Ms. Rabe says. But after the changes, she says, “the flashlight business took off and was wildly successful for many years after that.”

MS. RABE herself experienced similar problems while working as a transient “zero-gravity thinker” at Intel.

“I would ask my very, very basic questions,” she said, noting that it frustrated some of the people who didn’t know her. Once they got past that point, however, “it always turned out that we could come up with some terrific ideas,” she said.

While Ms. Rabe usually worked inside the companies she discussed in her book, she said outside consultants could also serve the zero-gravity role, but only if their expertise was not identical to that of the group already working on the project.

“Look for people with renaissance-thinker tendencies, who’ve done work in a related area but not in your specific field,” she says. “Make it possible for someone who doesn’t report directly to that area to come in and say the emperor has no clothes.”

Janet Rae-Dupree writes about science and emerging technology in Silicon Valley.