Sunday, January 27, 2008

21st Century JUICE!

The New York Times


January 27, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist

The Age of Ambition

DAVOS, Switzerland

With the American presidential campaign in full swing, the obvious way to change the world might seem to be through politics.

But growing numbers of young people are leaping into the fray and doing the job themselves. These are the social entrepreneurs, the 21st-century answer to the student protesters of the 1960s, and they are some of the most interesting people here at the World Economic Forum (not only because they’re half the age of everyone else).

Andrew Klaber, a 26-year-old playing hooky from Harvard Business School to come here (don’t tell his professors!), is an example of the social entrepreneur. He spent the summer after his sophomore year in college in Thailand and was aghast to see teenage girls being forced into prostitution after their parents had died of AIDS.

So he started Orphans Against AIDS (www.orphansagainstaids.org), which pays school-related expenses for hundreds of children who have been orphaned or otherwise affected by AIDS in poor countries. He and his friends volunteer their time and pay administrative costs out of their own pockets so that every penny goes to the children.

Mr. Klaber was able to expand the nonprofit organization in Africa through introductions made by Jennifer Staple, who was a year ahead of him when they were in college. When she was a sophomore, Ms. Staple founded an organization in her dorm room to collect old reading glasses in the United States and ship them to poor countries. That group, Unite for Sight, has ballooned, and last year it provided eye care to 200,000 people (www.uniteforsight.org).

In the ’60s, perhaps the most remarkable Americans were the civil rights workers and antiwar protesters who started movements that transformed the country. In the 1980s, the most fascinating people were entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who started companies and ended up revolutionizing the way we use technology.

Today the most remarkable young people are the social entrepreneurs, those who see a problem in society and roll up their sleeves to address it in new ways. Bill Drayton, the chief executive of an organization called Ashoka that supports social entrepreneurs, likes to say that such people neither hand out fish nor teach people to fish; their aim is to revolutionize the fishing industry. If that sounds insanely ambitious, it is. John Elkington and Pamela Hartigan title their new book on social entrepreneurs “The Power of Unreasonable People.”

Universities are now offering classes in social entrepreneurship, and there are a growing number of role models. Wendy Kopp turned her thesis at Princeton into Teach for America and has had far more impact on schools than the average secretary of education.

One of the social entrepreneurs here is Soraya Salti, a 37-year-old Jordanian woman who is trying to transform the Arab world by teaching entrepreneurship in schools. Her organization, Injaz, is now training 100,000 Arab students each year to find a market niche, construct a business plan and then launch and nurture a business.

The program (www.injaz.org.jo) has spread to 12 Arab countries and is aiming to teach one million students a year. Ms. Salti argues that entrepreneurs can stimulate the economy, give young people a purpose and revitalize the Arab world. Girls in particular have flourished in the program, which has had excellent reviews and is getting support from the U.S. Agency for International Development. My hunch is that Ms. Salti will contribute more to stability and peace in the Middle East than any number of tanks in Iraq, U.N. resolutions or summit meetings.

“If you can capture the youth and change the way they think, then you can change the future,” she said.

Another young person on a mission is Ariel Zylbersztejn, a 27-year-old Mexican who founded and runs a company called Cinepop, which projects movies onto inflatable screens and shows them free in public parks. Mr. Zylbersztejn realized that 90 percent of Mexicans can’t afford to go to movies, so he started his own business model: He sells sponsorships to companies to advertise to the thousands of viewers who come to watch the free entertainment.

Mr. Zylbersztejn works with microcredit agencies and social welfare groups to engage the families that come to his movies and help them start businesses or try other strategies to overcome poverty. Cinepop is only three years old, but already 250,000 people a year watch movies on his screens — and his goal is to take the model to Brazil, India, China and other countries.

So as we follow the presidential campaign, let’s not forget that the winner isn’t the only one who will shape the world. Only one person can become president of the United States, but there’s no limit to the number of social entrepreneurs who can make this planet a better place.

You are invited to comment on this column at Mr. Kristof’s blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Movie Industry & The Creative Class!

Albom, Binder say incentives can make state site for films

January 23, 2008

BY DAWSON BELL

FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Michigan would become a preferred site for the film industry almost overnight if state government provided bigger financial incentives and other help to the people who make movies, according to testimony Tuesday from Free Press columnist and author Mitch Albom and Michigan native and filmmaker Mike Binder.

"This is a booming, growing business," Albom said, and "there is a simple way for us to get into it. Incentives will do it."

Albom, whose work has been adapted into several made-for-TV movies, and Binder, whose credits include "The Upside of Anger," urged the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee to act quickly on legislation to increase the tax breaks for movie and TV production from 20% to 40%.

They also urged the committee to create tax incentives for people who return to Michigan to work in the industry and beef up the state's Film Commission. Doing those things could spur a major industry and job creator within just a few years, Albom said.

Binder said the state needs to send a signal that its labor unions would welcome filmmakers.

Both said productions they are working on could be shot in Michigan as soon as this year if the incentives were put in place quickly.

Lawmakers attending the hearing signaled they were willing to move quickly.

State Sen. Hansen Clarke, D-Detroit, said his city was a perfect location for producers interested in "gritty urban reality." He also expressed hope that its appearance in film would make the city a more attractive place to live and work for young people.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm also supports increased incentives for TV and movie production, spokeswoman Liz Boyd said.

But details remain sketchy, and the actual legislation to enact the changes still is being drafted.

Contact DAWSON BELL at 313-222-6604 or dbell@freepress.com.



PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: Movie Industry and the Creative Class
_____

Politcally correct while generating CREATIVE vehicles for "capital formation" and addtitional revenue-generating activities.

These are also the kind of Creative Class assets that KEEP and ATTRACT 21st Century talent in and to our state.

Bring it On!

See more: http://www.dwiff.blogspot.com
_________________
Jim Ross
21st Century Digital Learning Environments
41810 Huntington Ct.
Clinton Township, MI 48038
586-228-0608

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

An "Ode" to an earlier endeavor.......Gone but not forgotten

Lights, camera, action ... Michigan

In our Opinion / Editorial

Detroit Free Press

January 22, 2008

Having recently enjoyed dinner together, perhaps Gov. Jennifer Granholm, state House Speaker Andy Dillon and Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop could next take in a movie.

And take in the possibility, too, of rolling out a deep red carpet to bring more of the movie industry to Michigan. If Lansing's leadership is looking for an issue to wrap themselves bipartisanly around in the early going of this year, a hefty tax break to lure filmmakers could be it.

While it's not the kind of heavy industry that made Michigan so prosperous and proud in the past, the film/video business is a growing field that uses cutting-edge technology and appeals to the bright, young "creative class" folks who are leaving Michigan for lack of opportunities. Beyond writers, performers and directors, moviemaking also employs technicians, builders, logistics and numbers people, and food service and hospitality providers.

It's a $60-billion-a-year business in the United States that is expanding with the number of outlets to show movies -- cable stations are hungry for original programming -- and the new means of delivering video information. It's not just about commercial feature films anymore, either, but also advertising, music videos, games, instructional DVDs and television shows. That DVD that came with the elliptical trainer you got for Christmas had to be made somewhere.

Michigan will never displace sunny southern California as the heart of the movie industry, but recent trends show that moviemakers will work anywhere if there's a tax payoff. That's why a number of recent movies set in Detroit ("Four Brothers," "Assault on Precinct 13," for example) were largely shot in Ontario.

Canada has enjoyed great success with a tax-break strategy; provinces are now competing with each other to offer the best deals. States have begun queuing up with tax plans and proposals, too. Put another way, Michigan is already late to this game.

However, language is being drafted for legislation that could set the tax rebate for filmmakers as high as 35%-40%, the best deal in the country. A state Senate committee is scheduled to consider the possibilities at a hearing this afternoon in Lansing, although a bill is not yet ready.

This seems like the proverbial no-brainer.

It brings new business and jobs into Michigan, even if only for as long as the filmmaking lasts, so whatever revenue the state gets is new money; 60% of something is better than 100% of nothing. There's no double-standard against other employers, since Michigan has a long history of offering tax breaks to coveted businesses or using tax incentives for the expansion of existing companies.

Successful commercial movies put a place on the map. Couples who see "Somewhere in Time" are still drawn to romantic weekends on Mackinac Island, where the movie was made in 1979. Michigan offers just about every kind of location, four seasons and, unfortunately, has a huge inventory of big, empty buildings that could be converted to sound stages. Not much happening inside the Wixom plant these days.

Movie companies can now get a 12%-20% state tax write-off on their costs in Michigan. Janet Lockwood, director of the Michigan Film Office, said "Michigan has to go big" in whatever tax plan is offered to compete with other states, such as New Mexico and Connecticut, which are aggressively grabbing larger shares of the movie business.

With bipartisan interest, the state House had a hearing on the tax-break idea last fall. and Lansing's Gongwer News Service reported Monday that Gov. Jennifer Granholm might have something to say about it in her State of the State speech next week.

Seems like the stage is set. Action!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: Lights Camera, Action!
_____

Could be a "Detroit Ticket" to ride. Creative Class and Content "Catalyst!" Sign-on for more at http://www.dwiff.blogspot.com

Best,

Jim Ross
_________________
Jim Ross
21st Century Digital Learning Environments
41810 Huntington Ct.
Clinton Township, MI 48038
586-228-0608

THINK STEM CENTER / MICHIGAN

Pfizer to announce contribution today

Pfizer Inc. will announce major donations to benefit science education and the life sciences in Michigan Tuesday.


That happens to be the one-year anniversary of the date the company announced it would shut down its Ann Arbor pharmaceutical research center, eliminating 2,100 jobs and 2.1 million square feet of real estate.

Gathering at a warehouse in Ypsilanti to make the 11 a.m. announcement will be Michael A. Finney, president and CEO of Ann Arbor Spark; Stephen T. Rapundalo, executive director of MichBio; Ronald R. Kitchens, CEO of Southwest Michigan First; Debra Gmerek, vice president of Pfizer Global Research and Development, and representatives of the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, Wayne State University and Eastern Michigan University.

UPDATE

Pfizer's giveaway aids labs, schools


January 23, 2008

BY ROBIN ERB

FREE PRESS EDUCATION WRITER

It's a going-out-of-business giveaway -- just in time to replace your outdated mini vortexer or microtome cryostat.

For those breaking into the world of research and development in life sciences, there is at least $5.5 million worth of state-of-the-art valuables taken from Pfizer's soon-to-close Ann Arbor research facility that will be available to use on the cheap.

Last week, another load of Pfizer equipment was delivered to a warehouse in Ypsilanti managed in part by Ann Arbor SPARK, the area's economic development group.

Through an agreement with the group, the surplus equipment and supplies may be licensed for 1% of their market value for 3 years, said Joseph (Skip) Simms, the group's executive director.

Called the Michigan Innovation Equipment Depot, the project began more than a year ago when Pfizer donated $1 million in equipment to SPARK for Michigan's businesses. Friday's delivery was part of $4.5 million worth of equipment headed for start-up businesses. A list can be found at www.AnnArborUSA.org/MIED.

In the year since Pfizer announced it would close the Ann Arbor facility and shave jobs in other locations in Michigan, it has also shared the wealth with schools.

Pfizer turned over a 46-acre research campus in Holland to Michigan State University. And $1.25 million worth of goods is heading to MSU, the University of Michigan, Wayne State University and Eastern Michigan University.

About $250,000 in lab supplies will go to other schools.